A judge's throwaway comment about my exhibits still stings

Had a hearing in Charlotte last spring where I spent two weeks assembling a binder of evidence for a breach of contract case. The judge flipped through it and said 'counsel, this looks like you printed the entire internet, I need the three pages that matter.' That hit hard because I thought more paper meant more prepared. Since then I changed how I handle every filing. I now lead with a one-page summary that states the key facts, the exact contract clause, and the dollar amount at issue, like 47k in this case. I also color code exhibits by claim and cut every document that doesn't directly support a specific element. My last two motions got ruled on without a single request for clarification. Has anyone else had a judge basically tell them to simplify, and how did you adjust your approach without losing important detail?

1 comments

1 Comment

the_olivia1mo ago

Wait, did you really need two whole weeks to make that binder? I'm not trying to be harsh, but that's a lot of time for a breach case, and I wonder if the judge's comment was more about how you spent your time than the actual paper count. I get the urge to cover everything, but I learned the hard way that judges want the story, not the library. Color coding and a one pager is smart, but make sure you're not cutting stuff just to cut it, sometimes a timeline or a single email can do more than ten duplicates. Also, that 47k figure, you might want to check your math on the damages, I've seen that number get tossed around wrong in contract cases more than once.

-1