Loading…
5
Just realized my fabric choice for a 1920s dress hits an ethical snag
I was making a flapper dress and picked up some rayon because it looks like silk but costs way less. At first, I figured it was a good save, you know, since real silk is pricey. But then I read that rayon wasn't common back then, so my dress won't be right for the time. I started thinking about how using modern stuff changes the whole point of historical sewing. It feels wrong to cut corners just to save a few bucks, but not everyone can afford the real materials. So now I'm stuck in this spot where being accurate fights with being practical, and it bugs me. Kind of makes you wonder where to draw the line, right?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
uma_wilson797mo ago
Totally get that. Ruined a Victorian jacket with polyester velvet once, felt like a historical cheat. Sometimes you just gotta use what you can afford and call it "inspired by.
9
tara_martin877mo ago
Wait, hold up - rayon was totally a 1920s thing. They called it "artificial silk" and it was all the rage because it was cheaper. Your dress is probably more period correct than you think. The real mix of fabrics back then was wild anyway - real silk, rayon, even early acetates. I get the guilt, but you might be stressing over nothing.
4
alexw747mo ago
That 1924 Vogue ad for "artificial silk" evening gowns proves Tara's point. You're not just period correct, you're accidentally doing historical reenactment. The fun part is they didn't have a forum full of people to feel bad about it back then, they just wore the shiny dress. Our modern guilt over fabric content is maybe the least authentic thing about the whole hobby.
9