Admitted the moon landing denier friend had one good point

I argued with Dave for 2 hours about the Van Allen belts, then actually read the NASA radiation study he kept citing. Turns out the dosimetry data is genuinely murky. Still think we landed, but the radiation debate is way less settled than I assumed. Anyone else find one solid fact in a theory you otherwise reject?

0 comments

0 Comments

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this discussion.