Loading…
1
DAE flip their stance on the moon landing hoax after looking into it?
I always thought the moon landings were staged because of some weird photos. Then I read about how other countries tracked the missions and left mirrors we still bounce lasers off of. That kind of proof is hard to argue with. Has anyone else had a theory fall apart like that?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
the_wesley7mo ago
Changed my mind HARD on this one. I was deep into the hoax stuff, but learning about the mirrors we bounce lasers off of changed EVERYTHING. That proof is just too strong to ignore. @jade_mason98 nailed it with the film expert army point, like how could they fake all that back then? Once you look into the REAL facts, the whole theory crumbles. Now I'm totally sold it was real.
2
jake_bell997mo ago
Those Apollo photos have the camera crosshairs showing up BEHIND objects sometimes. How does that happen if they're really on the lens? The mirror proof assumes the equipment is still up there working right, but we only have NASA's word on the laser results. The film expert argument ignores that Kubrick was making 2001 at the same time with way more advanced effects. They could have managed a closed set.
5
jade_mason987mo ago
Man, same here. I was totally into the flag waving thing as proof. Then I saw how they'd need like, a secret army of film experts to fake it all with 60s tech. That broke the whole idea for me.
0