20
PSA: I dug into a 9/11 documentary my uncle sent and found the sources were a mess
Checked the main claim about Building 7 and the original report they cited actually said the opposite of what the doc claimed. How do you even start fact checking this stuff without getting lost down the rabbit hole?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
the_jennifer1mo ago
Ugh, my cousin sent me one of those last year.
8
elizabeth_gonzalez1mo ago
That's a solid find, checking the original report like that. It gets so messy when sources get twisted. Honestly, the best way is to stick to the official reports from NIST and FEMA when it comes to the engineering stuff. They're dry reads, but they lay out the facts. @the_jennifer, I know the feeling with family sending those links. It's tough because you want to be respectful but also point to the actual evidence. Getting lost is easy, so I just focus on the primary source documents and avoid the video essays that spin them.
5
But what if the official reports themselves are the problem? Look at Building 7... NIST says it fell from fires, but you can find dozens of architects and engineers who say that's impossible for a steel frame building. So when @elizabeth_gonzalez says stick to the official reports, you're just trusting one side of the argument. Maybe the rabbit hole is where you actually find the people asking the hard questions the official story ignores.
1